Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15256070›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine

The comparison of different protocols for expansion of umbilical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cells.

Mihaela Chivu, Carmen C Diaconu, Coralia Bleotu, Irina Alexiu, Lorelei Brasoveanu, C Cernescu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mihaela ChivuSt. S. Nicolau Institute of Virology, sos. Mihai Bravu, Bucharest 030304, Romania.
Carmen C Diaconu
Coralia Bleotu
Irina Alexiu
Lorelei Brasoveanu
C Cernescu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoiesis is maintained by the activity of multipotent stem cells, which have the dual capacity to self-renew and to differentiate into all of the blood cell lineages. The major challenge of stem cells based regenerative therapy is to expand ex vivo the primitive compartment to increase transplantable stem cells number. The present study was designed to evaluate several culture systems for in vitro maintenance of umbilical cord blood stem cells. The influences of different growth conditions such as stromal feeder layer, cytokines supplement and placental conditioned medium (PCM) have been evaluated over a relatively short period of time on CD34(+) cell expansion and maintenance of clonogenic progenitors. When cells were expanded on feeder layer in the presence of added cytokines and PCM on average a 2.96-fold increase of CD34(+)CD71(-) and a 3.13-fold increase of CD34(+)HLA-DR(-) was observed. The total number of colony forming cells (35 +/- 2.65) indicated also that the yield of clonogenic progenitors obtained with a combination of all factors was two folds higher than each of these factors alone and ten time above control (3.67 +/- 2.52). In conclusion, the results of our study clearly show that the ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic progenitor cells obtained from human umbilical cord blood is dependent on controlled experimental conditions, which might be helpful when designing culture systems for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD34BiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCulture Media, ConditionedCytokinesFetal BloodHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansAntigens, CD34BiomarkersCulture Media, ConditionedCytokines

Identifiers

PMID15256070
PMCPMC6740219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.