Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15255048›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2004

Feedback control of T-cell receptor activation.

Cliburn Chan, Jaroslav Stark, Andrew J T George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mathematical models of TCR initial triggering.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Manipulating antigenic ligand strength to selectively target myelin-reactive CD4+ T cells in EAE.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2010
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cliburn ChanDepartment of Immunology, Division of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK.
Jaroslav Stark
Andrew J T George

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity and sensitivity of T-cell recognition is vital to the immune response. Ligand engagement with the T-cell receptor (TCR) results in the activation of a complex sequence of signalling events, both on the cell membrane and intracellularly. Feedback is an integral part of these signalling pathways, yet is often ignored in standard accounts of T-cell signalling. Here we show, using a mathematical model, that these feedback loops can explain the ability of the TCR to discriminate between ligands with high specificity and sensitivity, as well as provide a mechanism for sustained signalling. The model also explains the recent counter-intuitive observation that endogenous 'null' ligands can significantly enhance T-cell signalling. Finally, the model may provide an archetype for receptor switching based on kinase-phosphatase switches, and thus be of interest to the wider signalling community.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsFeedback, PhysiologicalLigandsPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphotransferasesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSensitivity and SpecificitySignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesLigandsPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphotransferasesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID15255048
PMCPMC1691681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.