Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15253920›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy.

Kjell A Salvesen, Siv Mørkved

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02582580 (Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02582580 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2015 to 2017Enrolled63ConditionsPregnancyArmsPerineal massage, Vaginal Dilator, Pelvic floor muscles training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Does antenatal pelvic floor muscle training affect the outcome of labour? A randomised controlled trial.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2008
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Pilates exercise in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Six-Week Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity (sEMG) Training in Pregnant Women as Prevention of Stress Urinary Incontinence.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kjell A SalvesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trondheim University Hospital St. Olav, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway. pepes@medisin.ntnu.no
Siv Mørkved
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine a possible effect on labour of training the muscles of the pelvic floor during pregnancy.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingTrondheim University Hospital and three outpatient physiotherapy clinics in a primary care setting.

participants301 healthy nulliparous women randomly allocated to a training group (148) or a control group (153).

interventionA structured training programme with exercises for the pelvic floor muscles between the 20th and 36th week of pregnancy.

main outcome measuresDuration of the second stage of labour and number of deliveries lasting longer than 60 minutes of active pushing among women with spontaneous start of labour after 37 weeks of pregnancy with a singleton fetus in cephalic position.

resultsWomen randomised to pelvic floor muscle training had a lower rate of prolonged second stage labour (24%, 95% confidence interval 16% to 33%; 22 out of 105 women were at risk (undelivered) at 60 minutes in the survival analysis) than women allocated to no training (38% (37/109), 28% to 47%). The duration of the second stage was not significantly shorter (40 minutes v 45 minutes, P = 0. 06).

conclusionsA structured training programme for the pelvic floor muscles is associated with fewer cases of active pushing in the second stage of labour lasting longer than 60 minutes.

Indexed as

EpisiotomyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansLabor Stage, SecondObstetric Labor ComplicationsPelvic FloorPregnancyUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID15253920
PMCPMC509343
OpenAlexW1963503437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.