Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15253333›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Medical Association2004

Generations of loss: contemporary perspectives on black infant mortality.

Adrienne J Headley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physician Advice to Adolescents About Smoking: Who Gets Advised and Who Benefits Most?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2016
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adrienne J HeadleyUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family Medicine, 1 World's Fair Drive, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA. headleaj@umdnj.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. black infant mortality rate (IMR) remains a significant public health concern. Although improved during the last four decades, the U.S. IMR remains within the lowest tier of IMRs for all industrialized countries, and black American infants remain disproportionately represented in low birthweight (LBW) and infant death statistics. Numerous risk factors have been analyzed for their relative contributions to the U.S. IMR and black-white infant survival health disparities. Those factors include prenatal care quality and access, maternal socioeconomic status (SES), HIV/AIDS status, infections, intrapartum risk factors, existing comorbidities, social support, and nutritional status. However, the role of these and other factors have not fully explained the higher infant mortality risks for black infants. This review will discuss a variety of risk factors that contribute to infant mortality disparities between non-Hispanic black and white infants. Among those factors, the goal will be to review selected topics pertaining to maternal SES, LBW, preterm birth, perinatology advances, birth record data quality, maternal stress, prenatal care adequacy, and physical and substance abuse, and the relationships of those topics to black-white IMR health disparities.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityBirth CertificatesBlack or African AmericanHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornNutritional StatusPrenatal CareRisk FactorsSocial ClassSocial SupportUnited States

Identifiers

PMID15253333
PMCPMC2568419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.