Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15244120›Full record

ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2004

Requests for emergency contraception at an accident and emergency department--assessing the impact of a change in legislation.

S Mawhinney, O Dornan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S MawhinneyObstetrics and Gynaecology, Antrim Area Hospital, 45 Bush Road, Antrim BT41 2RL. sandramawhinney@dsl.pipex.com
O Dornan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the pattern of attendance of patients requesting Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC) at an accident and emergency department before and after a government driven change in legislation, which allowed EHC to be sold over-the-counter by trained pharmacists, to women aged 16 years and above. We employed retrospective comparative study using computer records of all accident and emergency attendances coded as requests for emergency contraception for the years 2000 and 2001. The number of patients requesting emergency contraception at the A&E department decreased after over-the-counter sales were introduced, from 196 in the year 2000 to 164 in 2001 (p = 0.037). Despite this, the number of teenagers requesting emergency contraception at the A&E department increased in 2001--from 63 in 2000 to 74 in 2001 (p = 0.0115). Most requests are received outside local pharmacy opening hours--63.77% in 2000 and 62.2% in 2001. This study raises concerns that the government initiative allowing emergency hormonal contraception to be sold in pharmacies is having little impact on teenagers most in need of this service. A&E departments can expect to continue to receive a significant number of requests for emergency contraception. Further measures will be required to reduce the U.K.'s high rate of unplanned pregnancies.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, PostcoitalLegislation, DrugAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMiddle AgedNonprescription DrugsRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomContraceptives, PostcoitalNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID15244120
PMCPMC2475446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.