ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004
A quantitative analysis of cell volume and resting potential determination and regulation in excitable cells.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mechanisms underlying the distinct K+ dependencies of periodic paralysis.The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
- Somatosensory-evoked response induces extensive diffusivity and kurtosis changes associated with neural activity in rodents.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Reduced KThe Journal of physiology · 2024Article
- Mathematical modeling of intracellular osmolarity and cell volume stabilization: The Donnan effect and ion transport.The Journal of general physiology · 2024Article
- Nernst-Planck-Gaussian finite element modelling of CaFrontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- How Merkel cells transduce mechanical stimuli: A biophysical model of Merkel cells.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The NaBiophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Nernst-Planck-Gaussian modelling of electrodiffusional recovery from ephaptic excitation between mammalian cardiomyocytes.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- The Donnan-dominated resting state of skeletal muscle fibers contributes to resilience and longevity in dystrophic fibers.The Journal of general physiology · 2022Article
- Molecular basis of ventricular arrhythmogenicity in a Pgc-1α deficient murine model.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2021Article
- Chloride dynamics alter the input-output properties of neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- A Theoretical Approach for the Electrochemical Characterization of Ciliary Epithelium.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A Reverse-Osmosis Model of Apoptotic Shrinkage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- The logic of ionic homeostasis: Cations are for voltage, but not for volume.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Quantitative Model for Ion Transport and Cytoplasm Conductivity of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Biological interactions of biocompatible and water-dispersed MoSScientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Role of the low-selective organic anion transport in regulation of osmotic balance of renal collecting duct principal cells under hypo-osmotic conditions.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper quantifies recent experimental results through a general physical description of the mechanisms that might control two fundamental cellular parameters, resting potential (Em) and cell volume (Vc), thereby clarifying the complex relationships between them. Em was determined directly from a charge difference (CD) equation involving total intracellular ionic charge and membrane capacitance (Cm). This avoided the equilibrium condition dEm/dt = 0 required in determinations of Em by previous work based on the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation and its derivatives and thus permitted precise calculation of Em even under non-equilibrium conditions. It could accurately model the influence upon Em of changes in Cm or Vc and of membrane transport processes such as the Na+-K+-ATPase and ion cotransport. Given a stable and adequate membrane Na+-K+-ATPase density (N), Vc and Em both converged to unique steady-state values even from sharply divergent initial intracellular ionic concentrations. For any constant set of transmembrane ion permeabilities, this set point of Vc was then determined by the intracellular membrane-impermeant solute content (X-i) and its mean charge valency (zX), while in contrast, the set point of Em was determined solely by zX. Independent changes in membrane Na+ (PNa) or K+ permeabilities (PK) or activation of cation-chloride cotransporters could perturb Vc and Em but subsequent reversal of such changes permitted full recovery of both Vc and Em to the original set points. Proportionate changes in PNa, PK and N, or changes in Cl- permeability (PCl) instead conserved steady-state Vc and Em but altered their rates of relaxation following any discrete perturbation. PCl additionally determined the relative effect of cotransporter activity on Vc and Em, in agreement with recent experimental results. In contrast, changes in Xi- produced by introduction of a finite permeability term to X- (PX) that did not alter zX caused sustained changes in Vc that were independent of Em and that persisted when PX returned to zero. Where such fluxes also altered the effective zX they additionally altered the steady state Em. This offers a basis for the suggested roles of amino acid fluxes in long-term volume regulatory processes in a variety of excitable tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.