Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15243077›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Joshua W Courtney, Leah M Kostelnik, Nordin S Zeidner, Robert F Massung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Theileria annulata diagnostics: past, present and future.Tropical animal health and production · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy of RevolutionParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploration of geographical population structure ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review of Molecular Tools Used in Diagnosis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua W CourtneyViral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., MS G-13, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Leah M Kostelnik
Nordin S Zeidner
Robert F Massung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiplex real-time PCR assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. The assay was tested on various Anaplasma, Borrelia, Erhlichia, and Rickettsia species, as well as on Bartonella henselae and Escherichia coli, and the assay was found to be highly specific for A. phagocytophilum and the Borrelia species tested (B. burgdorferi, B. parkeri, B. andersonii, and B. bissettii). The analytical sensitivity of the assay is comparable to that of previously described nested PCR assays (A. phagocytophilum, 16S rRNA; B. burgdorferi, fla gene), amplifying the equivalent of one-eighth of an A. phagocytophilum-infected cell and 50 borrelia spirochetes. The dynamic range of the assay for both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi was >/=4 logs of magnitude. Purified DNA from A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi was spiked into DNA extracted from uninfected ticks and from negative control mouse and human bloods, and these background DNAs were shown to have no significant effect on sensitivity or specificity of the assay. The assay was tested on field-collected Ixodes scapularis ticks and shown to have 100% concordance compared to previously described non-probe-based PCR assays. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a real-time multiplex PCR assay that can be used for the simultaneous and rapid screening of samples for A. phagocytophilum and Borrelia species, two of the most common tick-borne infectious agents in the United States.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBorrelia burgdorferiHL-60 CellsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificityBacterial Outer Membrane Proteinsmsp2 protein, Anaplasma phagocytophilumRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID15243077
PMCPMC446246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.