ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004
Comparative evaluation of the new version of the INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria and genotype Mycobacterium assays for identification of Mycobacterium species from MB/BacT liquid cultures artificially inoculated with Mycobacterial strains.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- One-step multiplex PCR assay for identification ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Tuberculosis: What Do We Have, What Do We Need?Pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS Assay for Species Identification of Mycobacteria.Cureus · 2025Article
- Biochip-Based Identification of Mycobacterial Species in Russia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Misidentification ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021Article
- Evaluation of IVD 3.0 Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria and its use in routine diagnostics.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Genotype MTBDRFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- A Case of False-PositiveCase reports in infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Evaluation of a low-density hydrogel microarray technique for mycobacterial species identification.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Demonstrating a multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplification microarray.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- Distribution of nontuberculous mycobacteria by multigene sequence-based typing and clinical significance of isolated strains.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Standing of nucleic acid testing strategies in veterinary diagnosis laboratories to uncover Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex members.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2014Review
- Role of GenoType(®) Mycobacterium Common Mycobacteria/Additional Species Assay for Rapid Differentiation Between Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Different Species of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria.Journal of laboratory physicians · 2013Article
- Multi-centre evaluation of the speed-oligo Mycobacteria assay for differentiation of Mycobacterium spp. in clinical isolates.BMC infectious diseases · 2011Article
- Evaluation of INNO-LiPA mycobacteria v2 assay for identification of rapidly growing mycobacteria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2011Article
- Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis in resource-poor countries: challenges and opportunities.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2011Review
- Rapid method for identification of six common species of mycobacteria based on multiplex SNP analysis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Use of a novel multiplex probe array for rapid identification of Mycobacterium species from clinical isolates.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of two DNA line probe assays, a new version of INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) and the GenoType Mycobacterium (Hain Diagnostika, Nehren, Germany), were evaluated for identification of mycobacterial species isolated from liquid cultures. Both tests are based on a PCR technique and designed for simultaneous identification of different mycobacterial species by reverse hybridization and line probe technology. The INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria v2 targeting the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer region was developed for the simultaneous identification of 16 different mycobacterial species. The GenoType Mycobacterium, which targets the 23S rRNA gene, allows simultaneous identification of 13 mycobacterial species. Both tests were evaluated on 110 mycobacterial strains belonging to 22 different mycobacterial species (20 reference strains, 83 clinical strains, and 4 Mycobacterium kansasii strains isolated from tap water) that were previously inoculated into MB/BacT bottles. The sensitivity of both methods, defined as the number of positive results obtained with the Mycobacterium genus probe together with an interpretable result on the number of samples tested was 110 of 110 (100%) for INNO-LiPA and 102 of 110 (92.7%) for GenoType. For samples with interpretable results, INNO-LiPA was able to correctly identify 109 of 110 samples (99.1%), whereas the GenoType correctly identified 100 of 102 samples (98.0%). Both tests were easy to perform, rapid, and reliable when applied to mycobacterial identification directly from MB/BacT bottles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.