Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15243039›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Prospective study of a real-time PCR that is highly sensitive, specific, and clinically useful for diagnosis of meningococcal disease in children.

Penelope A Bryant, Hua Yi Li, Angelo Zaia, Julia Griffith, Geoff Hogg, Nigel Curtis, Jonathan R Carapetis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis in a tertiary care hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Penelope A BryantPaediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Hua Yi Li
Angelo Zaia
Julia Griffith
Geoff Hogg
Nigel Curtis
Jonathan R Carapetis
Royal Children's Hospital · AUPublic Health LaboratoryGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the early administration of antibiotics, meningococcal disease is increasingly difficult to diagnose by culturing. Laboratory studies have shown PCR to be sensitive and specific, but there have been few clinical studies. The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of meningococcal PCR through a prospective comparison of real-time PCR, nested PCR, and standard culturing of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The setting was a tertiary-care pediatric hospital in Australia, and the participants were 118 children admitted with possible septicemia or meningitis. The main outcome measures-sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values-were compared to a "gold standard " fulfilling clinical and laboratory criteria. For 24 cases of meningococcal disease diagnosed by the gold standard, culturing of blood or CSF was positive for 15 (63%), nested PCR was positive for 21 (88%), and real-time PCR was positive for 23 (96%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of real-time PCR (the most sensitive test) for all specimens were, respectively, 96% (95% confidence interval, 79 to 99%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 96 to 100%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 85 to 100%), and 99% (95% confidence interval, 94 to 100%). Of 54 patients with suspected meningococcal disease at admission, 23 had positive PCR results. Only one PCR specimen was positive in a patient thought unlikely to have meningococcal disease at admission. Blood PCR remained positive for 33% of patients tested at up to 72 h. Real-time PCR has high positive and negative predictive values in this clinical setting, with better confirmation of cases than nested PCR. Targeting patients for PCR based on admission criteria appears to be practical, and the test may remain useful for several days after the start of antibiotic administration.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMeningococcal InfectionsNeisseria meningitidisPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID15243039
PMCPMC446275
OpenAlexW2096713261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.