ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004
Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antiretroviral resistance mutations by high-density DNA probe arrays.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro- and nanotechnology for viral detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2009Review
- Genotypic resistance testing in HIV by arrayed primer extension.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2008Article
- DNA probe array for the simultaneous identification of herpesviruses, enteroviruses, and flaviviruses.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Molecular diagnostics in virology.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotypic resistance testing has become an important tool in the clinical management of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Standard sequencing methodology and hybridization-based technology are the two principal methods used for HIV-1 genotyping. This report describes an evaluation of a new hybridization-based HIV-1 genotypic test of 99 clinical samples from patients infected mostly with HIV-1 subtype B and receiving treatment. This test combines RNA extraction with magnetic silica particles, amplification by nested reverse transcriptase PCR, and detection with high-density probe arrays designed to detect 204 antiretroviral resistance mutations simultaneously in Gag cleavage sites, protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and gp41. The nested reverse transcriptase PCR success rates at viral loads exceeding 1,000 copies/ml were 98% for the 2.1-kb amplicon that covers the Gag cleavage sites and the protease and reverse transcriptase genes, 92% for the gp41 amplicon, and 100% for the integrase amplicon. We analyzed 4,465 relevant codons with the HIV-1 DNA chip genotyping assay and the classic sequence-based method. Key resistance mutations in protease and reverse transcriptase were identified correctly 95 and 92% of the time, respectively. This test should be a valuable alternative to the standard sequence-based system for HIV-1 drug resistance monitoring and a useful diagnostic tool for simultaneous multiple genetic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.