Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15242868›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Hospital at home for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence.

Felix S F Ram, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, John Wright, Michael Greenstone

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01552031 (Monitoring COPD Patients at Home by a Forced Oscillation Technique Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01552031 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Monitoring COPD Patients at Home by a Forced Oscillation Technique Device

TypeobservationalSponsorRaffaele DellacaRan2011 to 2018Enrolled80ConditionsCOPD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characteristics associated with accepting hospital at home among patients with cancer and their caregivers: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felix S F RamNational Collaborating Centre for Women and Children's Health, London NW1 4RG. fsfram@yahoo.co.uk
Jadwiga A Wedzicha
John Wright
Michael Greenstone

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of hospital at home schemes compared with inpatient care in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

designA systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

main outcome measureMortality and readmission to hospital.

resultsSeven trials with 754 patients were included in the review. Hospital readmission and mortality were not significantly different when hospital at home schemes were compared with inpatient care (relative risk 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.12, and 0.61, 0.36 to 1.05, respectively). However, compared with inpatient care, hospital at home schemes were associated with substantial cost savings as well as freeing up hospital inpatient beds.

conclusionsHospital at home schemes can be safely used to care for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD who would otherwise be admitted to hospital. Clinicians should consider this form of management, especially as there is increasing pressure for inpatient beds in the United Kingdom.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID15242868
PMCPMC506849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.