Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15242705›Full record

ReviewInsect biochemistry and molecular biology2004

Olfactory regulation of mosquito-host interactions.

L J Zwiebel, W Takken

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 332 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Host Feeding Patterns ofBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L J ZwiebelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Program in Developmental Biology and Center for Molecular Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, VU Station, B 3582, Nashville, TN 37235-3582, USA. l.zwiebel@vanderbilt.edu
W Takken
Vanderbilt University · USWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Examination of Odorant Receptors in Vector MosquitoesR01AI056402 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZWIEBEL, LAURENCE J · 2003 to 2013
$4.0M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF OLFACTION IN ANOPHELINE MOSQUITOESR01DC004692 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZWIEBEL, LAURENCE J · 2000 to 2004
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056402NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes that act as disease vectors rely upon olfactory cues to direct several important behaviors that are fundamentally involved in establishing their overall vectorial capacity. Of these, the propensity to select humans for blood feeding is arguably the most important of these olfactory driven behaviors in so far as it significantly contributes to the ability of these mosquitoes to transmit pathogens that cause diseases such as dengue, yellow fever and most significantly human malaria. Here, we review significant advances in behavioral, physiological and molecular investigations into mosquito host preference, with a particular emphasis on studies that have emerged in the post-genomic era that seek to combine these approaches.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsCulicidaeHumansMalariaSignal TransductionSmell

Identifiers

PMID15242705
PMCPMC3100215
OpenAlexW2075818935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.