Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15241502›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2004

[Adult-onset primary immunodeficiencies].

S Gadola, U Salzer, H Schultz, B Grimbacher

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S GadolaKlinik für Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie/Allergologie, Universitätsspital INSEL, Bern, Schweiz. stephan.gadola@insel.ch
U Salzer
H Schultz
B Grimbacher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different individuals with the same kind of primary immunodeficiency may start having symptoms from early childhood on, or alternatively much later in adult life, or never. The differences in phenotype can only partly be deduced from genotype-analysis or--in case of female patients with X-linked diseases--from age-related skewing of lyonisation. The role of compensatory immune mechanisms is less clear. The microbial spectrum of infections is usually the same for both adult and infantile forms of a special primary immunodeficiency syndrome. Yet, many of the adult forms are associated with non-infectious complications, such as granuloma formation, autoimmunity or tumors. Besides standard antibiotic treatment and IgG replacement therapy, there are now different cytokine- or enzyme-replacement regimens available for some of the primary immunodeficiencies. However, exact diagnostic classification of the immunodeficiency should be obtained before such treatment modalities are used. Adult primary immunodeficiency syndromes therefore represent a challenge to both clinicians and molecular biologists.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChromosomes, Human, XCommon Variable ImmunodeficiencyFemaleGenotypeHumansImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesMaleMiddle AgedOpportunistic InfectionsPhenotypePrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.