Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15240489›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2004

The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate.

Arjan van der Vaart, Jianpeng Ma, Martin Karplus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.Journal of computational chemistry · 2009
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Allostery and cooperativity revisited.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2008
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and assisted folding of a substrate protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arjan van der VaartInstitut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires, Université Louis Pasteur, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Jianpeng Ma
Martin Karplus

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A molecular dynamics simulation of the active unfolding of denatured rhodanese by the chaperone GroEL is presented. The compact denatured protein is bound initially to the cis cavity and forms stable contacts with several of the subunits. As the cis ring apical domains of GroEL undergo the transition from the closed to the more open (ATP-bound) state, they exert a force on rhodanese that leads to the increased unfolding of certain loops. The contacts between GroEL and rhodanese are analyzed and their variation during the GroEL transition is shown. The major contacts, which give rise to the stretching force, are found to be similar to those observed in crystal structures of peptides bound to the apical domains. The results of the simulation show that multidomain interactions play an essential role, in accord with experiments. Implications of the results for mutation experiments and for the action of GroEL are discussed.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularProtein FoldingBinding SitesChaperonin 60Escherichia coliMutationProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein SubunitsThiosulfate SulfurtransferaseChaperonin 60Protein SubunitsThiosulfate Sulfurtransferase

Identifiers

PMID15240489
PMCPMC1304377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.