Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15238530›Full record

ArticleGenetics2004

Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Brian Charlesworth, Helen Borthwick, Carolina Bartolomé, Patricia Pignatelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Deleterious Substitutions in Crop Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  19. The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian CharlesworthInstitute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom. brian.charlesworth@ed.ac.uk
Helen Borthwick
Carolina Bartolomé
Patricia Pignatelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The net rate of mutation to deleterious but nonlethal alleles and the sizes of effects of these mutations are of great significance for many evolutionary questions. Here we describe three replicate experiments in which mutations have been accumulated on chromosome 3 of Drosophila melanogaster by means of single-male backcrosses of heterozygotes for a wild-type third chromosome. Egg-to-adult viability was assayed for nonlethal homozygous chromosomes. The rates of decline in mean and increase in variance (DM and DV, respectively) were estimated. Scaled up to the diploid whole genome, the mean DM for homozygous detrimental mutations over the three experiments was between 0.8 and 1.8%. The corresponding DV estimate was approximately 0.11%. Overall, the results suggest a lower bound estimate of at least 12% for the diploid per genome mutation rate for detrimentals. The upper bound estimates for the mean selection coefficient were between 2 and 10%, depending on the method used. Mutations with selection coefficients of at least a few percent must be the major contributors to the effects detected here and are likely to be caused mostly by transposable element insertions or indels.

Indexed as

GenomeAllelesAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCrosses, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenes, LethalMaleModels, GeneticMutationOvum

Identifiers

PMID15238530
PMCPMC1470907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.