ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2004
Synaptic shunting by a baseline of synaptic conductances modulates responses to inhibitory input volleys in cerebellar Purkinje cells.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 40-year history of modeling active dendrites in cerebellar Purkinje cells: emergence of the first single cell "community model".Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015Review
- Dendritic signals command firing dynamics in a mathematical model of cerebellar Purkinje cells.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Dendritic excitability modulates dendritic information processing in a purkinje cell model.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2010Article
- Model-founded explorations of the roles of molecular layer inhibition in regulating purkinje cell responses in cerebellar cortex: more trouble for the beam hypothesis.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2010Article
- Causes of transient instabilities in the dynamic clamp.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2009Article
- Regularity, variability and bi-stability in the activity of cerebellar purkinje cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
When processing synaptic input in vivo, large neurons in the brain must cope with thousands of events each second. Much work has focused on the specific processing of synchronous excitatory input volleys, both in cerebellar and cerebral cortical research. Here we pursue the question of how a continuous background of ongoing 'noise' inputs interacts with the processing of synchronous inhibitory input volleys. Specifically we examine the processing of inhibitory input transients in cerebellar Purkinje cells, which by inducing pauses in Purkinje cell spike activity may lead to a disinhibition of the deep cerebellar nuclei and thus to cerebellar motor command signals. We use the technique of dynamic clamping in vitro to simulate controlled patterns of in vivo like background inputs. We use electrical stimulation of inhibitory interneurons in the deep or upper molecular layer to create inhibitory input transients that lead to spike pauses in Purkinje cell activity. These pauses were much longer in the absence than in the presence of background inputs applied with dynamic clamping. We found that a significant amount of the synaptic current elicited by electrical stimulation was shunted by the background inputs. The overall amount of background conductance as well as the pattern of background inputs modulated spike pause duration in a specific manner. This modulation by shunting may be employed in vivo to evaluate the salience of specific sensory input received by cerebellar cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.