ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2004
[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal carcinoma].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Lymphadenectomy with tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymph node status as an important prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer is affected by the selection and number of lymph nodes examined and by the quality of histopathological assessment. The multitude of influences is accompanied by an elevated risk of quality alterations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is currently under investigation for its value in improving determination of the nodal status. Worldwide, the data of 800 to 1000 patients from about 20 relatively small studies are available that focus rather on colon than rectal cancer patients. SLNB may be of clinical value for the collective of patients that are initially node-negative after H&E staining but reveal small micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in the SLN after intensified histopathological workup. If further studies confirm that these patients benefit from adjuvant therapy, the method may have an important effect on the therapy and prognosis of colon cancer patients as well. Another potential application could be the determination of the nodal status after endoscopic excision of early cancer to avoid bowel resection and lymphonodectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.