ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Assessing the benefit-harm balance at the bedside.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Antiepileptic drugs' tolerability and safety--a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse effects in dogs.BMC veterinary research · 2016Pooled it
- Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2009Pooled it
- Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach.BMC medical research methodology · 2007Pooled it
- A strategy for regulatory action when new adverse effects of a licensed product emerge.Drug safety · 2009Review
- Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Review
- Guest editorial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2005Article
- Communicating with patients about harms and risks.PLoS medicine · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.