ArticleBritish journal of cancer2004
Benefits of specialisation in the management of pancreatic cancer: results of a Scottish population-based study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey.Updates in surgery · 2019Article
- A cancer geography paradox? Poorer cancer outcomes with longer travelling times to healthcare facilities despite prompter diagnosis and treatment: a data-linkage study.British journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Socioeconomic status, comorbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Scotland 2004-2011: a cohort study.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2016Article
- Impact of centralization of pancreatoduodenectomy on reported radical resections rates in a nationwide pathology database.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Article
- "Is general surgery still relevant to the subspecialised trainee?" A 10 year comparison of general versus specialty surgical practice.World journal of surgery · 2015Article
- Pancreaticoduodenal resection for malignancy in a low-volume center: long-term outcomes from a developing country.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2013Article
- Centralization of services and reduction of adverse events in pancreatic cancer surgery.World journal of surgery · 2013Article
- Increasing survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in Scotland: a review of national cancer registry data.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2013Article
- Mortality associated with the treatment of gallstone disease: a 10-year contemporary national experience.World journal of surgery · 2011Article
- Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population-based cohort study.Clinical epidemiology · 2011Article
- The role of cancer registries in cancer control.International journal of clinical oncology · 2008Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is associated with a very poor prognosis; however, in selected patients, resection may improve survival. Several recent reports have demonstrated that concentration of treatment activity for patients with pancreatic cancer has resulted in improved outcomes. The aim of this study was to ascertain if there was any evidence of benefit for specialised care of patients with pancreatic cancer in Scotland. Records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during the period 1993-1997 were identified. Three indicators of co-morbidity were calculated for each patient. Operative procedures were classified as resection, other surgery or biliary stent. Prior to analysis, consultants were assigned as specialist pancreatic surgeons, clinicians with an interest in pancreatic disease or nonspecialists. Data were analysed with regard to 30-day mortality and survival outcome. The final study population included 2794 patients. The 30-day mortality following resection was 8%, and hospital or consultant volume did not affect postoperative mortality. The 30-day mortality rate following palliative surgical operations was 20%, and consultants with higher case loads or with a specialist pancreatic practice had significantly fewer postoperative deaths (P=0.014 and 0.002, respectively). For patients undergoing potentially curative or palliative surgery, the adjusted hazard of death was higher in patients with advanced years, increased co-morbidity, metastatic disease, and was lower for those managed by a specialist (RHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.78) or by a clinician with an interest in pancreatic disease (RHR 0.63, 0.48-0.82). The risk of death 3 years after diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is higher among patients undergoing surgical intervention by nonspecialists. Specialisation and concentration of cancer care has major implications for the delivery of health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.