Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15222890›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2004

Some methods for blindfolded record linkage.

Tim Churches, Peter Christen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Design and implementation of a privacy preserving electronic health record linkage tool in Chicago.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Composite Bloom Filters for Secure Record Linkage.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pseudonymization of patient identifiers for translational research.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013
    Article
  9. Efficient Privacy-Aware Record Integration.Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology · 2013
    Article
  10. Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A simple heuristic for blindfolded record linkage.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2012
    Article
  13. Private medical record linkage with approximate matching.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010
    Article
  14. Privacy-preserving record linkage using Bloom filters.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009
    Article
  15. Building application-related patient identifiers: what solution for a European country?International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A practical approach to achieve private medical record linkage in light of public resources.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
  19. Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim ChurchesCentre for Epidemiology and Research, Population Health Division, New South Wales Department of Health, Locked Mail Bag 961, North Sydney NSW 2059, Australia. tchur@doh.health.nsw.gov.au
Peter Christen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe linkage of records which refer to the same entity in separate data collections is a common requirement in public health and biomedical research. Traditionally, record linkage techniques have required that all the identifying data in which links are sought be revealed to at least one party, often a third party. This necessarily invades personal privacy and requires complete trust in the intentions of that party and their ability to maintain security and confidentiality. Dusserre, Quantin, Bouzelat and colleagues have demonstrated that it is possible to use secure one-way hash transformations to carry out follow-up epidemiological studies without any party having to reveal identifying information about any of the subjects - a technique which we refer to as "blindfolded record linkage". A limitation of their method is that only exact comparisons of values are possible, although phonetic encoding of names and other strings can be used to allow for some types of typographical variation and data errors.

methodsA method is described which permits the calculation of a general similarity measure, the n-gram score, without having to reveal the data being compared, albeit at some cost in computation and data communication. This method can be combined with public key cryptography and automatic estimation of linkage model parameters to create an overall system for blindfolded record linkage.

resultsThe system described offers good protection against misdeeds or security failures by any one party, but remains vulnerable to collusion between or simultaneous compromise of two or more parties involved in the linkage operation. In order to reduce the likelihood of this, the use of last-minute allocation of tasks to substitutable servers is proposed. Proof-of-concept computer programmes written in the Python programming language are provided to illustrate the similarity comparison protocol.

conclusionAlthough the protocols described in this paper are not unconditionally secure, they do suggest the feasibility, with the aid of modern cryptographic techniques and high speed communication networks, of a general purpose probabilistic record linkage system which permits record linkage studies to be carried out with negligible risk of invasion of personal privacy.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksComputer SecurityConfidentialityEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansMedical InformaticsMedical Record LinkageMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPrivacyProgramming LanguagesPublic HealthSoftware

Identifiers

PMID15222890
PMCPMC471556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.