Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15221165›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2004

Movement-related and preparatory activity in the reticulospinal system of the monkey.

John A Buford, Adam G Davidson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Express Visuomotor Responses Reflect Knowledge of Both Target Locations and Contextual Rules during Reaches of Different Amplitudes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Long-latency Responses to a Mechanical Perturbation of the Index Finger Have a Spinal Component.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John A BufordDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, 1583 Perry Street, Rm 516G, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Buford.5@osu.edu
Adam G Davidson

Funding

YILMA SIV VACCINIA VACCINE TRIALP51RR000166 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HU, SHIU-LOK · 1985 to 2011
$161.1M
RETICULOSPINAL CONTROL OF REACHINGR01NS037822 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUFORD, JOHN A, JAKEMAN, LYN B · 1999 to 2014
$3.6M
NCRR NIH HHS RR00166NINDS NIH HHS K08-NS01587NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS37822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three monkeys ( M. fascicularis) performed a center-out, two-dimensional reaching task that included an instructed delay interval based on a color-coded visuospatial cue. Neural activity in the medial pontomedullary reticular formation (mPMRF) was recorded along with hand movement. Of 176 neurons with movement-related activity, 109 (62%) had movement-related but not preparatory activity (M cells), and 67 (38%) had both movement-related and preparatory activity (MP cells). EOG analyses indicated that the preparatory activity was not consistent with control of eye movements. There were slight changes in electromyograms (EMG) late in the instructed delay period before the Go cue, but these were small compared with the movement-related EMG activity. Preparatory activity, like the EMG activity, was also confined to the end of the instructed delay period for 14 MP cells, but the remaining 53 MP cells (30%) had preparatory activity that was not reflected in the EMG. Peri-movement neural activity varied with movement direction for 70% of the cells, but this variation rarely fit circular statistics commonly used for studies of directional tuning; directional tuning was even less common in the preparatory activity. These data show that neurons in the mPMRF are strongly modulated during small reaching movements, but this modulation was rarely correlated with the trajectory of the hand. In accord with findings in the literature from other regions of the CNS, evidence of activity related to motor preparation in these cells indicates that this function is distributed in the nervous system and is not a feature limited to the cerebral cortex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiomechanical PhenomenaCuesElectromyographyElectrooculographyEvoked PotentialsHandMacaca fascicularisMaleMovementNeuronsPsychomotor PerformanceReticular FormationTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.