Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15221139›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2004

Pine genes regulated by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusarium circinatum.

Alison M Morse, C Dana Nelson, Sarah F Covert, Angela G Holliday, Katherine E Smith, John M Davis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Co-Infections byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Dual RNA-Sequencing Analysis of Resistant (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic dissection of fusiform rust and pitch canker disease traits in loblolly pine.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison M MorseSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.
C Dana Nelson
Sarah F Covert
Angela G Holliday
Katherine E Smith
John M Davis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A targeted genomics approach was used to construct a cDNA array of potential pathogen-regulated genes for investigating host-pathogen interactions in pine trees (Pinus species). This array, containing a nonredundant set of 311 cDNAs, was assembled by combining smaller sets of cDNAs generated by differential display or suppression subtraction hybridization using a variety of pathogen treatments and elicitors. The array was probed to identify host genes regulated by Fusarium circinatum, a necrotrophic fungus that incited pitch canker disease on pine stems. A set of 29 cDNAs were induced during the disease state. Notably, cDNAs on the array that were derived from experiments with fusiform rust, incited by Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme (a biotrophic fungus) were unregulated by Fusarium. the results imply distinct genetic responses in pine to diseases incited by necrotrophs and biotrophs. This cDNA collection expands the genomics toolkit for understanding interactions between conifers and their microbial associates in forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBlotting, NorthernDNA, ComplementaryFusariumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPinusPlant DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Complementary

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.