ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience
Paired turbulence and light do not produce a supralinear calcium increase in Hermissenda.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reaction-diffusion models in weighted and directed connectomes.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Approaches and tools for modeling signaling pathways and calcium dynamics in neurons.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2013Review
- The role of type 4 phosphodiesterases in generating microdomains of cAMP: large scale stochastic simulations.PloS one · 2010Article
- Modelling the molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity using systems biology approaches.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2010Review
- An efficient stochastic diffusion algorithm for modeling second messengers in dendrites and spines.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2006Article
- Subcellular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms underlying classical conditioning in Hermissenda crassicornis.Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist · 2006Review
- A new era in computational neuroscience.Neuroinformatics · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The sea slug Hermissenda learns to associate light and hair cell stimulation, but not when the stimuli are temporally uncorrelated. Memory storage, which requires an elevation in calcium, occurs in the photoreceptors, which receive monosynaptic input from hair cells that sense acceleration stimuli such as turbulence. Both light and hair cell activity increase calcium concentration in the photoreceptor, but it is unknown whether paired calcium signals combine supralinearly to initiate memory storage. A correlate of memory storage is an enhancement of the long lasting depolarization (LLD) after light offset, which is attributed to a reduction in voltage dependent potassium currents; however, it is unclear what causes the LLD in the untrained animal. These issues were addressed using a multi-compartmental computer model of phototransduction, calcium dynamics, and ionic currents of the Hermissenda photoreceptor. Simulations of the interaction between light and hair cell activity show that paired stimuli do not produce a greater calcium increase than unpaired stimuli. This suggests that hair cell activity is acting via some other pathway to initiate memory storage. In addition, simulations show that a potassium leak channel, which closes with an increase in calcium, is required to produce both the untrained LLD and the enhanced LLD due to the decrease in voltage dependent potassium currents. Thus, the expression of this correlate of classical conditioning may depend on a leak potassium current.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.