Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1521081›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation1992

Unrelated donor marrow transplants for severe acquired aplastic anemia.

J Hows, R Szydlo, C Anasetti, B Camitta, J Gajewski, E Gluckman

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J HowsDepartment of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, London.
R Szydlo
C Anasetti
B Camitta
J Gajewski
E Gluckman
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report is divided into two parts. The first part is a retrospective analysis of 40 unrelated transplants [UD-BMT] for severe acquired aplastic anemia [SAA], performed at five transplant centers between 1981 and 1990. The second is an interim analysis of 15 UD-BMT for SAA compared with a matched cohort of 16 sibling transplants [ID-BMT] carried out since February 1989 using prospectively collected data provided by the IMUST Study Group. In the retrospective study the actuarial survival was 28% [+/- 15] with a median follow-up of 1485 [266-3890] days post BMT. Univariate analysis showed a considerable survival advantage for patients younger than 15 years at BMT [p = 0.03]. More recently patients entered in the IMUST Study showed an actuarial survival of 50% [+/- 27] for UD-BMT compared with 58% [+/- 31] for ID-BMT recipients. These data suggest that UD-BMT is a realistic option for paediatric patients with SAA. Although numbers are very small there is some indication from IMUST Study data that better patient selection and intensive BMT protocols may also improve the results of UD-BMT in young adult patients with SAA.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationAdolescentAdultAnemia, AplasticChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID1521081
OpenAlexW2425384200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.