Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15210662›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2004

Long term outcome of small versus appropriate size for gestational age co-twins/triplets.

M Monset-Couchard, O de Bethmann, J-P Relier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gestational overgrowth and undergrowth affect neurodevelopment: similarities and differences from behavior to epigenetics.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Discordance in neonatal risk factors and early childhood outcomes of very low birth weight (<1.5 kg) twins.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neonatal anthropometric charts: what they are, what they are not.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Monset-CouchardHopital Cochin, 123 Bd de Port Royal, Paris 75014, France. secret.neonat@cch.ap-hop-paris.fr
O de Bethmann
J-P Relier
Maternité Port Royal · FRHôpital Cochin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall for gestational age (SGA) extremely low birthweight (ELBW < 1000 g) survivors often remain small and/or have subnormal school performance. Some are twins/triplets with larger appropriate size for gestational age (AGA) co-twins/triplets.

objectiveTo assess whether SGA ELBW twins/triplets remain different from their AGA co-twins/triplets. DESIGN,

settingDuring 1981-1999, 353 SGA ELBW neonates were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit: 267 survived, 54/267 were twins/triplets, and 36/54 had AGA surviving co-twins/triplets. This longitudinal study describes the growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, and school performance of these 36 sets (3-17 years). The children were classified as normal, or having minor, moderate, or severe deficiencies.

resultsValues for birth weight (mean intrapair z score difference 2.26), length (2.74), and head circumference (2.62) were lower in SGA neonates than in AGA co-twins/triplets. SGA survivors remained smaller at 3-6 years of age: mean intrapair z score difference in weight, 1.37, height, 1.54, head circumference, 1.21. From 6 to 17 years, smaller differences persisted. Former SGA children had a tendency to have motor deficiencies (nine SGA v three AGA) and mental retardation (seven v four), same hearing loss (two v two), but significantly more visual abnormalities (15 v 11), behavioural disturbances (14 v five), and speech problems (14 v eight). Twenty four sets were in the same normal level class, often supported by familial/professional help.

conclusionsAlthough raised in the same environment, SGA ELBW survivors remained smaller and had more visual/behavioural/speech problems, but most maintained grade level parity with their AGA siblings, with appropriate help.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGestational AgeGrowth DisordersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMale

Identifiers

PMID15210662
PMCPMC1721732
OpenAlexW1990982688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.