Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15210641›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2004

Author self-citation in the diabetes literature.

Apoor S Gami, Victor M Montori, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Author Self-Citation in the Turkish Otorhinolaryngology Literature.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2021
    Article
  7. The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-citation in Iran in Comparison with Other Countries.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Citation and self-citation in medical research in Iran.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Self-citation in publishing.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Apoor S GamiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. gami.apoor@mayo.edu
Victor M Montori
Nancy L Wilczynski
R Brian Haynes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuthor self-citation is the practice of citing one's previous publications in a new publication. Its extent is unknown. We studied author self-citation, choosing the major clinical field of diabetes mellitus to represent the general medical literature.

methodsWe identified every article about diabetes mellitus in 170 hand-searched clinical journals published in 2000. For every article, we recorded the bibliographic citation and publication type (original or review article) and assessed the methodologic rigour. Citation information was obtained from the ISI Web of Knowledge in April 2003.

resultsOf 49,028 articles, 289 were about diabetes mellitus and had citation information. Citation counts ranged from 0 to 347 (median 6, interquartile range [IQR] 2-12). Author self-citation counts ranged from 0 to 16 (median 1, IQR 0-2). Author self-citations accounted for an average of 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15%-21%) and a median of 7% (95% CI 5%- 11%) of all citations of each publication that was cited at least once (n = 266). Original articles had double the mean proportion of author self-citations compared with review articles (19% v. 9%; median 7% v. 0%, difference 7%, 95% CI 0- 10%). Methodologic rigour and review type were not significantly associated with subsequent author self-citation.

interpretationNearly one-fifth of all citations to articles about diabetes mellitus in clinical journals in the year 2000 were author self-citations. The frequency of self-citation was not associated with the quality of publications. These findings are likely applicable to the general clinical medicine literature and may have important implications for the assessment of journal or publication importance and the process of scientific discovery.

Indexed as

AuthorshipBibliometricsDiabetes MellitusPublishingResearchBiasHumans

Identifiers

PMID15210641
PMCPMC421720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.