Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15209607›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2004

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and dose-related outcomes in older adults with new heart failure in the community.

Paula A Rochon, Kathy Sykora, Susan E Bronskill, Muhammad Mamdani, Geoffrey M Anderson, Jerry H Gurwitz, Sudeep Gill, Jack V Tu, Andreas Laupacis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The place for ACE inhibitors.Journal of general internal medicine · 2004
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula A RochonDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. paula.rochon@utoronto.ca
Kathy Sykora
Susan E Bronskill
Muhammad Mamdani
Geoffrey M Anderson
Jerry H Gurwitz
Sudeep Gill
Jack V Tu
Andreas Laupacis
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CABaycrest Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the dose-related benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy among older adults with heart failure and to evaluate whether low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is better than none.

designObservational cohort study.

settingCommunity-dwelling older adults in Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS/

participantsWe identified 16539 adults 66 years or older who survived 45 days following their first heart failure hospitalization discharge. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

resultsMultivariate techniques including propensity scores were used to study the association between the dose of ACE inhibitor therapy dispensed and 3 outcomes: survival, survival or heart failure rehospitalization, and survival or all-cause hospitalization at 1 year of follow-up. Logistic regression models explored the association between initial dose dispensed and subsequent dose reduction or drug cessation. Overall, 10793 (65.3%) of patients were dispensed ACE inhibitor therapy, with more than a third (3935; 36.5%) initiated on low-dose therapy. Relative to dispensing of low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, nonuse was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.22). Dispensing medium-dose therapy provided a benefit similar to low-dose (HR, 0.94; CI, 0.86 to 1.03) and dispensing of high-dose therapy was associated with improved survival benefit (HR, 0.76; CI, 0.68 to 0.85). Relative to dispensing of low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, dispensing high-dose conferred a benefit (HR, 0.87; CI, 0.80 to 0.95) on the composite outcome of 1-year mortality or heart failure hospitalization and the composite outcome of 1-year mortality or all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.87; CI, 0.81 to 0.93). Relative to those dispensed low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, those initially dispensed high-dose therapy were twice as likely to have their subsequent dose reduced or the therapy discontinued (odds ratio, 2.36; CI, 2.07 to 2.69).

conclusionOur findings suggest that when possible, older adults should be titrated to the higher doses of ACE inhibitor therapy evaluated in clinical trials. If older adults cannot tolerate higher doses, then low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is superior to none. High-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is not as well tolerated as lower doses.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleOdds RatioOntarioProportional Hazards ModelsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15209607
PMCPMC1492384
OpenAlexW2046099163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.