Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15209600›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2004

Continuity of care and patient outcomes after hospital discharge.

Carl van Walraven, Muhammad Mamdani, Jiming Fang, Peter C Austin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04340960 (Effect of Continuity of Care With Digital Home Monitoring on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04340960 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Continuity of Care With Digital Home Monitoring on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (CDHM: RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsHome Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carl van WalravenFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. carlv@ohri.ca
Muhammad Mamdani
Jiming Fang
Peter C Austin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are often treated in hospital by physicians other than their regular community doctor. After they are discharged, their care is often returned to their regular community doctor and patients may not see the hospital physician. Transfer of information between physicians can be poor. We determined whether early postdischarge outcomes changed when patients were seen after discharge by physicians who treated them in the hospital.

methodsThis cohort study used population-based administrative databases to follow 938833 adults from Ontario, Canada, after they were discharged alive from a nonelective medical or surgical hospitalization between April 1, 1995, and March 1, 2000. We determined when patients were seen after discharge by physicians who treated them in the hospital, physicians who treated them 3 months prior to admission (community physicians), and specialists. The outcome of interest was 30-day death or nonelective readmission to hospital.

resultsOf patients studied, 7.7% died or were readmitted. The adjusted relative risk of death or readmission decreased by 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4% to 5%) and 3% (95% CI, 2% to 3%) with each additional visit to a hospital physician rather than a community physician or specialist, respectively. The effect of hospital physician visits was cumulative, with the adjusted risk of 30-day death or nonelective readmission reduced to 7.3%, 7.0%, and 6.7% if patients had 1, 2, or 3 visits, respectively, with a hospital rather than a community physician. The effect was consistent across important subgroups.

conclusionsPatient outcomes could be improved if their early postdischarge visits were with physicians who treated them in hospital rather than with other physicians. Follow-up visits with a hospital physician, rather than another physician, could be a modifiable factor to improve patient outcomes following discharge from hospital.

Indexed as

HospitalistsPatient DischargePhysicians, FamilyAgedCohort StudiesContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedOdds RatioOntarioPatient ReadmissionRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID15209600
PMCPMC1492386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.