Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15209599›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2004

Does a depression intervention result in improved outcomes for patients presenting with physical symptoms?

Robert D Keeley, Jeffrey L Smith, Paul A Nutting, L Miriam Dickinson, W Perry Dickinson, Kathryn M Rost

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The many C's of primary care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert D KeeleyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado 80045-0508, USA. Robert.Keeley@uchsc.edu
Jeffrey L Smith
Paul A Nutting
L Miriam Dickinson
W Perry Dickinson
Kathryn M Rost
Center for Research Strategies · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Health · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FOR DEPRESSIONR01MH054444 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ROST, KATHRYN M · 1998 to 2002
$784k
DEPRESSION TREATMENT QUALITY INDICATORS FOR EMPLOYER USEK02MH063651 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ROST, KATHRYN M · 2001 to 2005
$662k
NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH063651NIMH NIH HHS MH63651NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH054444NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH54444PHS HHS 5T32 HP1000610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effects of exclusively physical presentation of depression on 1). depression management and outcomes under usual care conditions, and 2). the impact of an intervention to improve management and outcomes. DESIGN AND

settingSecondary analysis of a depression intervention trial in 12 community-based primary care practices.

participantsTwo hundred adults beginning a new treatment episode for depression. MEASUREMENTS: Presenting complaint and physician depression query at index visit; antidepressant use, completion of adequate antidepressant trial, change in depressive symptoms, and physical and emotional role functioning at 6 months. MAIN

resultsSixty-six percent of depressed patients presented exclusively with physical symptoms. Under usual care conditions, psychological presenters were more likely than physical presenters to complete an adequate trial of antidepressant treatment but experienced equivalent improvements in depressive severity and role functioning. In patients presenting exclusively with physical symptoms, the intervention significantly improved physician query (40.8% vs 18.0%; P =.06), receipt of any antidepressant (63.0% vs 20.1%; P =.001), and an adequate antidepressant trial (34.9% vs 5.9%; P =.004), but did not significantly improve depression severity or role functioning. In patients presenting with psychological symptoms, the intervention significantly improved receipt of any antidepressant (79.9% vs 38.0%; P =.01) and an adequate antidepressant trial (46.0% vs 23.8%; P =.004), and also improved depression severity and physical and emotional role functioning.

conclusionsOur results suggest that there is a differential intervention effect by presentation style at the index visit. Thus, current interventions should be targeted at psychological presenters and new approaches should be developed for physical presenters.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsDepressionFemaleHumansMalePatient Care TeamPhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareStatistics as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID15209599
PMCPMC1492378
OpenAlexW1971136358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.