Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15209589›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2004

Evaluating and enhancing a women's health curriculum in an internal medicine residency program.

Diane B Wayne, Debra A DaRosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An elective course in women's health.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The continuing evolution of women's health.Journal of general internal medicine · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diane B WayneNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. dwayne@northwestern.edu
Debra A DaRosa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResident education in women's health is required but is often underemphasized. Our aim was to identify women's health topics with the most relevance to our graduates' practices and to determine how well they were prepared to address women's health issues.

designPostgraduate survey.

settingUniversity-affiliated internal medicine residency program.

participantsProgram graduates in general internal medicine practice.

methodsA survey was drafted listing the 65 topics described in a published residency curriculum in women's health. Respondents indicated the extent to which each item was relevant to their practice and the adequacy of instruction received on a Likert-type scale of 1 (not relevant/inadequate) to 5 (highly relevant/adequate).

resultsThe response rate was 86%. Many of the items were highly relevant to our graduates' practices. Learning needs were found in all areas as none of the topics were rated as "adequately" taught during residency. Many areas in the curriculum had low relevance scores. Few differences were seen in the perceived relevance of women's health problems or the adequacy of instruction received based on gender, practice type and setting, or amount of ambulatory training during residency.

conclusionsUse of this survey has allowed us to tailor and prioritize learning issues in women's health to meet the needs of our graduates. Increased time in ambulatory rotations alone may not be sufficient to prepare residents to provide comprehensive care in this field. Further study of the effectiveness of a dedicated curriculum in women's heath is needed.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyWomen's HealthChicagoCurriculumFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID15209589
PMCPMC1492488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.