Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15209204›Full record

GuidelineAnnals of family medicine

Screening for ovarian cancer: recommendation statement.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Abstract readGuidelinePractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Update in women's health for the general internist.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ovarian cancer screening.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansMass ScreeningOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsCA-125 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID15209204
PMCPMC1466669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.