Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15208057›Full record

Trial reportContraception2004

Single and multiple exposure tolerance study of polystyrene sulfonate gel: a phase I safety and colposcopy study.

Christine K Mauck, Debra H Weiner, Susan A Ballagh, Mitchell D Creinin, David F Archer, Jill L Schwartz, Helen C Pymar, Jaim-Jou Lai, William F Rencher, Marianne M Callahan and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contraception, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Non-Hormonal Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christine K MauckCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 1611 North Kent Street, Suite 806, Arlington 22209, USA. cmauck@conrad.org
Debra H Weiner
Susan A Ballagh
Mitchell D Creinin
David F Archer
Jill L Schwartz
Helen C Pymar
Jaim-Jou Lai
William F Rencher
Marianne M Callahan
CONRAD

Funding

WITHIN SUBJ VARIABILITY IN MEASUREMENTS DRUG METABOL ENZYMES IN HLTY SUBJM01RR000056 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEVINE, ARTHUR S · 1985 to 2006
$29.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000056NCRR NIH HHS MO1RR00056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate symptoms and signs of genital irritation, vaginal leakage and acceptability of polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), which is being studied as a vaginal contraceptive and microbicide.

methodsForty-nine women applied 2.5 mL of either 5% PSS, 10% PSS, PSS vehicle, or Conceptrol (a marketed spermicidal product containing 4% nonoxynol-9) for 6 consecutive days.

resultsAll women completed the study except one in the Conceptrol group who experienced vaginal symptoms after her first use and was discontinued. After both the first use and after all uses, irritation was seen among more women in the Conceptrol group than in the PSS groups, reaching statistical significance with regard to any evidence of irritation, signs of irritation and product-related irritation. There were no adverse events that were serious, unexpected and related to product use in any group. The 5% concentration of PSS may be preferable in terms of leakage and acceptability.

conclusionThe results suggest that PSS has a safety profile comparable to that of the marketed nonoxynol-9 product, Conceptrol, and appears to be associated with less genital irritation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Infective AgentsColposcopyDouble-Blind MethodDrug ToleranceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolystyrenesSpermatocidal AgentsVaginaVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAnti-Infective AgentsPolystyrenespolystyrene sulfonic acidSpermatocidal AgentsVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID15208057
PMCPMC2861169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.