Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15207612›Full record

ArticleVirology2004

SARS corona virus peptides recognized by antibodies in the sera of convalescent cases.

Jian-Ping Guo, Martin Petric, William Campbell, Patrick L McGeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic comparison among various coronavirus strains for the identification of potential vaccine targets of SARS-CoV2.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian-Ping GuoKinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3.
Martin Petric
William Campbell
Patrick L McGeer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We synthesized on cellulose membranes 4942 ten-amino-acid peptides which included all of the sequences predicted for the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) corona virus. We probed these membranes with four pairs of acute and convalescent sera from recovered SARS cases. We correlated positively reacting peptides with the in vitro SARS-CoV neutralizing activity of the samples. We found that convalescent sera with high neutralizing activity recognized exclusively only a limited number of peptides on the membranes. This suggests that antibodies against the epitopes represented by these peptides could be responsible for much of the SARS-CoV neutralizing activity. The findings have implications for monitoring humoral responses to SARS-CoV as well as for developing a successful SARS vaccine.

Indexed as

ConvalescenceAcute DiseaseAgedAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, ViralCelluloseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataNeutralization TestsPeptidesSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusViral ProteinsAntibodies, ViralCellulosePeptidesViral ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID15207612
PMCPMC7125913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.