Trial reportAtencion primaria2004
[Evaluation of a programme to monitor drug therapy in type-2 diabetics].
Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the results of pharmaceutical intervention in a programme to monitor the drug therapy of type-2 diabetics; and to assess the improvement of the indicators, glycosylated haemoglobin, basal glycaemia, lipid profile, albumin/creatinine, blood pressure, BMI, medication-related problems and adherence.
designRandomised clinical trial.
setting14 local pharmacies in the province of Pontevedra (Galicia), Spain. SUBJECTS: 126 type-2 diabetics, over 18 years old and who joined voluntarily a monitoring programme, distributed 50-50 into intervention and control groups. VARIABLES: The main variable was HbA1c. Other variables were: clinical indicators of metabolic control (mean basal glycaemia, lipid profile), blood pressure, BMI, medication-related problems, understanding of the illness and its complications, adherence to medical treatment and to changes in life-style, and incidence of complications.
methodsIntroduction and randomisation of patients. Recording of the initial status of the research variables, study and assessment stage, pharmaceutical interventions to detect and resolve any passing medication-related problems and educational activities. Referral to family doctor if his/her intervention required. Follow-up lasted 12 months with monthly scheduled visits and on-demand visits, after which the variables were assessed once more. The stages of study, evaluation, intervention and education did not occur in the control group. DISCUSSION: The study will enable the role of the chemist in achieving the objectives of controlling type-2 diabetes patients to be achieved through educational intervention and assistance in drug therapy monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.