Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15205712›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2004

Ibandronate in osteoporosis: preclinical data and rationale for intermittent dosing.

Frieder Bauss, R Graham G Russell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bisphosphonates inhibit surface-mediated osteogenesis.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2020
    Article
  5. Racial difference in bioavailability of oral ibandronate between Caucasian and Taiwanese postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms in osteonecrosis of the jaw.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2011
    Review
  11. Once-monthly risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.International journal of women's health · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2008
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bisphosphonates for malignancy-related bone disease: current status, future developments.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Frieder BaussRoche Diagnostics, Pharma Research Penzberg, Nonnenwald 2, D-82377 Penzberg, Germany. frieder.bauss@roche.com
R Graham G Russell
Roche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ibandronate is a highly potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. Unlike most other bisphosphonates, it is under clinical development for both oral and intravenous (i.v.) administration. Ibandronate can be used in convenient intermittent regimens that may optimize therapeutic outcome with enhanced compliance by patients. The preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacology of ibandronate have been extensively explored in a large preclinical development program involving various recommended animal models of human osteoporosis. These experimental studies of ibandronate indicate that the preclinical pharmacology and PK profile of ibandronate are broadly similar to those of other nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. The efficacy of intermittent administration of subcutaneous (s.c.) and i.v. ibandronate has been demonstrated in four animal models (rat, dog, minipig, and monkey). Thus in rats, dogs, and monkeys with estrogen depletion, and in minipigs with glucocorticoid-induced bone loss, ibandronate administered s.c. or i.v. with extended intervals between doses reduces bone turnover, increases bone mineral density, and maintains bone quality in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, studies in rats and dogs comparing continuous and intermittent treatment schedules indicate similar efficacy when the same cumulative dose is applied over the duration of the study. These studies with ibandronate illustrate the concept that the total cumulative dose of bisphosphonate administered determines the response, independent of whether the dose is given daily or less frequently in a given time period. The efficacy of intermittent regimens has also been verified in models of secondary osteoporosis due to secondary hyperparathyroidism or immobilization (both in rats), or due to glucocorticoids in minipigs. Important factors for determining efficacy and the magnitude of response are the doses given, the length of the interval between doses, and the underlying bone turnover rate. The mechanisms underlying the remarkable efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate dosing are not fully understood and further research is needed. Importantly, ibandronate is the only bisphosphonate so far proven to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures significantly with a between-dose interval >2 months, in a prospective clinical trial. Collectively, the preclinical studies on ibandronate have provided a sound basis for the design of the convenient regimens currently being examined in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone DensityBone ResorptionDiphosphonatesDrug Administration ScheduleHumansIbandronic AcidModels, AnimalOsteoporosisDiphosphonatesIbandronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID15205712
OpenAlexW2067177940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.