ArticleThe Biochemical journal1992
Steady-state kinetic mechanism of bovine brain tubulin: tyrosine ligase.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interplay between stochastic enzyme activity and microtubule stability drives detyrosination enrichment on microtubule subsets.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Mathematical modeling of the microtubule detyrosination/tyrosination cycle for cell-based drug screening design.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Tubulin tyrosine ligase structure reveals adaptation of an ancient fold to bind and modify tubulin.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ATP-dependent resynthesis of tubulin from tyrosine and untyrosinated tubulin was examined to establish the most probable steady-state kinetic mechanism of the tubulin: tyrosine ligase (ADP-forming). Three pair-wise sets of initial rate experiments, involving variation of two substrates pair-wise with the third substrate held at a high (but non-saturating) level, yielded convergent-line data, a behaviour that is diagnostic for sequential mechanisms. Michaelis constants were 14 microM, 1.9 microM and 17 microM for ATP, untyrosinated tubulin and L-tyrosine respectively, and the maximal velocity was 0.2 microM/min. AMP was a competitive inhibitor with respect to ATP, and a non-competitive inhibitor versus either tubulin or tyrosine. Likewise, L-dihydroxyphenylalanine acted competitively relative to tyrosine and non-competitively with respect to either ATP or tubulin. These findings directly support a random sequential mechanism. Product inhibition patterns with ADP were also consistent with this assignment; however, inhibition studies were not practical with either orthophosphate or tyrosinated tubulin because both were very weak inhibitors. Substrate protection of the enzyme against alkylation by N-ethylmaleimide and thermal inactivation, along with evidence of enzyme binding to ATP-Sepharose and tubulin-Sepharose, also supports the idea that this three-substrate enzyme reaction exhibits a random substrate addition pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.