Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1520272›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal1992

Kinetic analysis of the type-1 proinsulin endopeptidase by a monoclonal antibody-based immunoadsorbent assay.

E M Bailyes, J C Hutton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E M BailyesDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, U.K.
J C Hutton
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple, rapid and sensitive assay for the type-1 endopeptidase (Arg-Arg cleaving) was developed by using an antiproinsulin monoclonal immunoadsorbent to separate reaction products from the substrate. The values obtained by this assay were identical with those obtained by an h.p.l.c.-based procedure and yielded similar values for the pH optimum (5.6) and Ca2+ activation (K0.5 = 2 mM). It was shown that the type-1 endopeptidase was readily solubilized by Triton X-114 (87 +/- 3%, n = 12) and partitioned principally into the aqueous phase at 30 degrees C (90.1 +/- 2.6%, n = 12). Activity was lost on gel filtration, but could be restored by adenosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (K0.5 = 6 microM), 50 microM-dithiothreitol or 50 microM-Ca(2+)-trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-NNN'N'-tetra-acetic acid (CDTA), indicating that the enzyme was particularly sensitive to heavy metal ions. The Km obtained with proinsulin as substrate (13 +/- 1.7 microM) indicated that the enzyme works at close to its Vmax. in the nascent secretory granule. The Vmax. of the enzyme prepared from insulin granules (0.6% proinsulin converted/min) corresponded closely to the rate measured in vivo in rat islets. The type-1 endopeptidase also appears to be capable of binding to proinsulin in the region of the C-peptide/A-chain junction, since a peptide spanning this region was found to inhibit the 125I-proinsulin processing measured by this assay.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsEndopeptidasesHumansImmunosorbent TechniquesInsulinomaKineticsMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular Sequence DataPancreatic NeoplasmsPeptidesProinsulinRatsSubstrate SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalEndopeptidasesMacromolecular SubstancesPeptidesProinsulinproinsulin endopeptidase I

Identifiers

PMID1520272
PMCPMC1133043
OpenAlexW2336329853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.