Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15202113›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2004

Technical and clinical evaluation of anti-ribosomal P protein immunoassays.

M Mahler, K Kessenbrock, J Raats, M J Fritzler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05179018 (Clinical and Diagnostic Value of Ribosomal p2 Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05179018 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Diagnostic Value of Ribosomal p2 Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Case Control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsRibosomal p2 Autoantibodies as a Serum marker
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

M MahlerPharmacia Diagnostics, Freiburg, Germany. m.mahler.job@web.de
K Kessenbrock
J Raats
M J Fritzler
CS Diagnostics · DEHeidelberg University · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoantibodies to the three ribosomal phospho (-P) proteins P0, P1, P2, referred to as Rib-P, are specifically found in 10-40% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The variations in the observed frequency of these autoantibodies is related to a number of factors such as the test system used to detect the antibodies. Several immunoassays that were designed for research and diagnostic laboratory use have been developed. The autoantigens employed in these tests include native proteins, recombinant polypeptides, and synthetic peptides. In this study, we compared the technical and clinical accuracy of anti-Rib-P antibody assays from different commercial suppliers including ELISA systems and a novel addressable laser bead assay (from Euroimmun, MBL, Pharmacia Diagnostics, INOVA). Although the assays from all suppliers used in this study performed well in the technical part of the study, relatively poor correlations and significant differences in the clinical accuracy were found. Based on the results, we conclude that the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies strongly depends on both the nature of the antigen and the detection system. We recommend that anti-Rib-P assays should be standardized on an international level. The Varelisa Rib-P profile and the addressable laser bead Rib-P assays represent promising tools and platforms for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesAutoantigensElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoblottingLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhosphoproteinsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRecombinant ProteinsReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsRibosomal ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesAutoantigensphosphoprotein P2, ribosomalPhosphoproteinsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRecombinant Proteinsribosomal phosphoprotein P1ribosomal protein P0Ribosomal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15202113
PMCPMC6807712
OpenAlexW2168341232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.