Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15200816›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2004

Ring vaccination and smallpox control.

Mirjam Kretzschmar, Susan van den Hof, Jacco Wallinga, Jan van Wijngaarden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Monkeypox: Clinical Issues of Concern.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Ring vaccination for monkeypox containment: Strategic implementation and challenges.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The monkeypox virus.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Is it time to reconsider ring vaccination for COVID-19?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  17. Monkeypox: the resurgence of forgotten things.Epidemiology and health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Contact tracing - Old models and new challenges.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirjam KretzschmarDepartment of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. mirjam.kretzschmar@rivm.nl
Susan van den Hof
Jacco Wallinga
Jan van Wijngaarden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a stochastic model for the spread of smallpox after a small number of index cases are introduced into a susceptible population. The model describes a branching process for the spread of the infection and the effects of intervention measures. We discuss scenarios in which ring vaccination of direct contacts of infected persons is sufficient to contain an epidemic. Ring vaccination can be successful if infectious cases are rapidly diagnosed. However, because of the inherent stochastic nature of epidemic outbreaks, both the size and duration of contained outbreaks are highly variable. Intervention requirements depend on the basic reproduction number (R0), for which different estimates exist. When faced with the decision of whether to rely on ring vaccination, the public health community should be aware that an epidemic might take time to subside even for an eventually successful intervention strategy.

Indexed as

Contact TracingDisease OutbreaksHumansModels, BiologicalSmallpoxSmallpox VaccineStochastic ProcessesVaccinationVariola virusSmallpox Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID15200816
PMCPMC3323203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.