Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15200349›Full record

ReviewDrugs2004

Role of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of serious bacterial urinary tract infections.

Culley Carson, Kurt G Naber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibacterial Mechanisms and Clinical Impact of Sitafloxacin.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Codeine dysregulates ribosome biogenesis inFuture drug discovery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of quinolone-resistant uropathogenicInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Culley CarsonDivision of Urology, University of North Carolina, CB #7235, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7235, USA. carson@med.unc.edu
Kurt G Naber
Elisa (Finland) · FIUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serious urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adults--defined as acute complicated UTIs or pyelonephritis requiring initial intravenous antimicrobials and/or hospitalisation and nosocomial infections--cause significant morbidity and economic burden. In the US, UTIs are responsible for nearly 7 million outpatient physician office visits, 1 million emergency room visits and over 100 000 hospital admissions annually. Complicated UTIs often affect patients with underlying functional, metabolic or anatomical defects of the urinary tract, whereas most nosocomial UTIs (~80%) are related to short- or long-term catheterisation. Serious UTIs are often difficult to treat because infection involves a diverse array of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, coupled with increasing antimicrobial resistance in some uropathogens, and a higher rate of recurrent infections. Although Escherichia coli remains a common aetiology (< or =60%), other Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative bacilli (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus) are frequently isolated. Patients with long-term catheterisation have UTIs typically caused by organisms that produce biofilms making eradication even more difficult. Overall, aetiology and resistance patterns are not predictable for those with serious UTIs, necessitating confirmation by culture and susceptibility testing.Numerous intravenous and oral antimicrobial treatment options are available and the majority of patients with serious UTIs will need initial intravenous therapy because of the possibility of bacteraemia/sepsis or impaired gastrointestinal absorption. Many experts concur that empirical therapy for the institutionalised or hospitalised patient with a serious UTI should include an intravenous antipseudomonal agent because of an increased risk of urosepsis. While state-of-the-art treatment guidelines are lacking for these infections, targeted therapy should be initiated once susceptibility data are known. The use of targeted therapy--emphasising the "correct antibacterial spectrum" and pharmacodynamic superiority--is likely to provide important benefits (e.g. reduced morbidity and associated costs, reduced emergence of resistance). Agents commonly prescribed include aminoglycosides, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, imipenem, advanced-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Fluoroquinolones are often recommended when conventional agents have failed or are less desirable (e.g. toxicity/hypersensitivity concerns), or when resistance is high. Several pivotal clinical trials support the use of fluoroquinolones for serious UTIs with most experience garnered with ciprofloxacin, including a new once-daily extended-release tablet formulation.Treatment of patients with serious UTIs remains challenging. Physicians should choose empirical therapy based on patient demographics/medical history, presumed aetiology and local resistance patterns until more definitive guidelines become available.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBacterial InfectionsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, BacterialFluoroquinolonesHumansRisk FactorsUrinary Tract InfectionsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID15200349
OpenAlexW2066846104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.