ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2004
Synergistic transcription activation by Maf and Sox and their subnuclear localization are disrupted by a mutation in Maf that causes cataract.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Multiomics Analysis Reveals Novel Genetic Determinants for Lens Differentiation, Structure, and Transparency.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Review
- Crystallin gene expression: Insights from studies of transcriptional bursting.Experimental eye research · 2021Review
- Regulation of γδ T Cell Effector Diversification in the Thymus.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- The transcription factor c-Maf is essential for the commitment of IL-17-producing γδ T cells.Nature immunology · 2019Article
- Mutation update of transcription factor genes FOXE3, HSF4, MAF, and PITX3 causing cataracts and other developmental ocular defects.Human mutation · 2018Review
- Signaling and Gene Regulatory Networks in Mammalian Lens Development.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017Review
- Sox5 and c-Maf cooperatively induce Th17 cell differentiation via RORγt induction as downstream targets of Stat3.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2014Article
- Advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques--FRAP, FLIP, FLAP, FRET and FLIM.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Review
- Role of c-Maf in Chondrocyte Differentiation: A Review.Cartilage · 2011Review
- Lens fiber cell differentiation and denucleation are disrupted through expression of the N-terminal nuclear receptor box of NCOA6 and result in p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis.Molecular biology of the cell · 2010Article
- Visualization of molecular interactions using bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis: characteristics of protein fragment complementation.Chemical Society reviews · 2009Review
- Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis as a probe of protein interactions in living cells.Annual review of biophysics · 2008Review
- Bimolecular fluorescence complementation: visualization of molecular interactions in living cells.Methods in cell biology · 2008Article
- CD13/APN transcription is regulated by the proto-oncogene c-Maf via an atypical response element.Gene · 2007Article
- Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation during lens development.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2007Review
- Pax6 is misexpressed in Sox1 null lens fiber cells.Gene expression patterns : GEP · 2007Article
- Sequential and combinatorial roles of maf family genes define proper lens development.Molecular vision · 2007Article
- Large Maf Transcription Factors: Cousins of AP-1 Proteins and Important Regulators of Cellular Differentiation.The Einstein journal of biology and medicine : EJBM · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crystallin genes are selectively expressed during lens development. Maf and Sox family proteins synergistically enhanced gammaF-crystallin promoter activity in a lens cell line. Mutational analysis of the gammaF-crystallin promoter identified a composite regulatory element containing nonconsensus Maf and Sox recognition sequences. Mutations in these recognition sequences or changes in their spacing eliminated synergistic transcription activation. The transcriptional synergy was also affected by changes in the orientation of the Maf recognition sequence that had no detectable effect on binding affinity. The interaction between Maf and Sox proteins was visualized in living cells by bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis. The N-terminal region of Maf mediated the interaction with Sox proteins in cells. Synergistic transcription activation required the N-terminal region of Maf as well as the ancillary DNA binding domain and the unique portion of the basic region that mediate specific recognition of the gammaF-crystallin promoter element. A mutation in the ancillary DNA binding domain of Maf (R288P) that has been shown to cause cataract eliminated the transcriptional activity of Maf but had no detectable effect on DNA binding in vitro. Whereas wild-type Maf was uniformly distributed in the nucleoplasm, R288P Maf was enriched in nuclear foci. Cajal bodies and gemini of coiled bodies were closely associated with the foci occupied by R288P Maf. Wild-type Maf formed complexes with Sox proteins in the nucleoplasm, whereas R288P Maf recruited Sox proteins as well as other interaction partners to the nuclear foci. The mislocalization of normal cellular proteins to these foci provides a potential explanation for the dominant disease phenotype of the R288P mutation in Maf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.