Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15197519›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2004

The use of over-the-counter drugs among surgical and medical patients.

Bente Glintborg, Stig Ejdrup Andersen, Eva Spang-Hanssen, Kim Dalhoff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bente GlintborgClinic of Internal Medicine I, H:S Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig Ejdrup Andersen
Eva Spang-Hanssen
Kim Dalhoff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn increasing number of drugs are sold directly to the consumers without a prescription from pharmacies and from non-pharmacies such as supermarkets and gas stations. AIM OF STUDY: To analyse the consumption of over-the-counter drugs (OTCs) among patients recently discharged from two hospital departments. Furthermore, to describe where the drugs had been bought and to which extent OTCs used prior to admission were recorded in the hospital files.

methodPatients were visited within 1 week after discharge and interviewed about OTC use. Home inventories were inspected. Hospital files and discharge letters were examined.

resultsIn totally, 83 surgical and 117 medical patients were included (n=200). Whereas the home inventories of 187 patients comprised 587 OTCs, 13 patients (7%) stored no OTCs. Of the patients, 134 (67%) used OTCs daily and 132 patients (66%) used OTCs on demand; 79 patients (40%) stored a total of 157 OTCs not currently used. Analgesics were used by 138 patients (78%). Acetaminophen was the OTC used most frequently. Of the 240 OTCs used daily, 238 (99%) had been purchased from pharmacies and 169 (70%) had been prescribed. Of the 430 OTCs used daily or on demand, 348 (81%) had been recommended verbally or prescribed by health care professionals. Among the 206 OTCs used daily prior to admission, 162 (79%) were recorded in hospital files, whereas only 41 (24%) of 173 OTCs used on demand were recorded.

conclusionTwo of three surgical and medical patients use OTCs daily. Most OTCs are used with the consent of health care professionals and are purchased from pharmacies. Pre-admission OTC use is incompletely recorded in the hospital files. If information was systematically collected from pharmacies and general practitioners, the number of recall biases concerning OTC use in the medication histories may be reduced.

Indexed as

Nonprescription DrugsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComplementary TherapiesData CollectionDenmarkDietary SupplementsDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.