Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15197500›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2004

A comparison of (111)In-DOTATOC and (111)In-DOTATATE: biodistribution and dosimetry in the same patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

F Forrer, H Uusijärvi, C Waldherr, M Cremonesi, P Bernhardt, J Mueller-Brand, H R Maecke

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Altered biodistribution of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Comparison ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Development of NovelBiomolecules · 2020
    Article
  14. Correlation of dose with toxicity and tumour response toEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT: where molecular imaging has an edge over morphological imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. PET SUV correlates with radionuclide uptake in peptide receptor therapy in meningioma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

F ForrerInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. fforrer@uhbs.ch
H Uusijärvi
C Waldherr
M Cremonesi
P Bernhardt
J Mueller-Brand
H R Maecke
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Gothenburg · SEEuropean Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Yttrium-90-DOTA-Tyr(3)]-octreotide (DOTATOC) and [(177)Lu-DOTA-Tyr(3)-Thr(8)]-octreotide (DOTATATE) are used for peptide receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy (PRMRT) in neuroendocrine tumours. No human data comparing these two compounds are available so far. We used (111)In as a surrogate for (90)Y and (177)Lu and examined whether one of the (111)In-labelled peptides had a more favourable biodistribution in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Special emphasis was given to kidney uptake and tumour-to-kidney ratio since kidney toxicity is usually the dose-limiting factor. Five patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours were injected with 222 MBq (111)In-DOTATOC and (111)In-DOTATATE within 2 weeks. Up to 48 h after injection, whole-body scans were performed and blood and urine samples were collected. The mean absorbed dose was calculated for tumours, kidney, liver, spleen and bone marrow. In all cases (111)In-DOTATATE showed a higher uptake (%IA) in kidney and liver. The amount of (111)In-DOTATOC excreted into the urine was significantly higher than for (111)In-DOTATATE. The mean absorbed dose to the red marrow was nearly identical. (111)In-DOTATOC showed a higher tumour-to-kidney absorbed dose ratio in seven of nine evaluated tumours. The variability of the tumour-to-kidney ratio was high and the significance level in favour of (111)In-DOTATOC was P=0.065. In five patients the pharmacokinetics of (111)In-DOTATOC and (111)In-DOTATATE was found to be comparable. The two peptides appear to be nearly equivalent for PRMRT in neuroendocrine tumours, with minor advantages for (111)In/(90)Y-DOTATOC; on this basis, we shall continue to use (90)Y-DOTATOC for PRMRT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Indexed as

AgedBody BurdenBone MarrowHumansKidneyMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsOrgan SpecificityRadiation DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsSpleenTissue Distribution111In-octreotate, DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)-Thr(8)-EdotreotideOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID15197500
OpenAlexW1985249499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.