Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15196007›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2004

Exploring molecular and mechanical gradients in structural bioscaffolds.

J Herbert Waite, Helga C Lichtenegger, Galen D Stucky, Paul Hansma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights into the Red SeaweedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The puncture mechanics: an example from the bed bugJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Localization of ZnSoft matter · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Structure, function and parallel evolution of the bivalve byssus, with insights from proteomes and the zebra mussel genome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Tunable Wood by Reversible Interlocking and Bioinspired Mechanical Gradients.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Herbert WaiteDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA. waite@lifesci.ucsb.edu
Helga C Lichtenegger
Galen D Stucky
Paul Hansma
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Biomimetic Blades: Mincing with Less MineralR01DE014672 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI WAITE, JOHN HERBERT · 2003 to 2005
$2.5M
Mussel-Inspired Protective CoatingsR01DE015415 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI WAITE, JOHN HERBERT · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE014672NIDCR NIH HHS DE015415NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014672NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most organisms consist of a functionally adaptive assemblage of hard and soft tissues. Despite the obvious advantages of reinforcing soft protoplasm with a hard scaffold, such composites can lead to tremendous mechanical stresses where the two meet. Although little is known about how nature relieves these stresses, it is generally agreed that fundamental insights about molecular adaptation at hard/soft interfaces could profoundly influence how we think about biomaterials. Based on two noncellular tissues, mussel byssus and polychaete jaws, recent studies suggest that one natural strategy to minimize interfacial stresses between adjoining stiff and soft tissue appears to be the creation of a "fuzzy" boundary, which avoids abrupt changes in mechanical properties. Instead there is a gradual mechanical change that accompanies the transcendence from stiff to soft and vice versa. In byssal threads, the biochemical medium for achieving such a gradual mechanical change involves the elegant use of collagen-based self-assembling block copolymers. There are three distinct diblock copolymer types in which one block is always collagenous, whereas the other can be either elastin-like (soft), amorphous polyglycine (intermediate), or silk-like (stiff). Gradients of these are made by an incrementally titrated expression of the three proteins in secretory cells the titration phenotype of which is linked to their location. Thus, reflecting exactly the composition of each thread, the distal cells secrete primarily the silk- and polyglycine-collagen diblocks, whereas the proximal cells secrete the elastin- and polyglycine-collagen diblocks. Those cells in between exhibit gradations of collagens with silk or elastin blocks. Spontaneous self-assembly appears to be by pH triggered metal binding by histidine (HIS)-rich sequences at both the amino and carboxy termini of the diblocks. In the polychaete jaws, HIS-rich sequences are expanded into a major block domain. Histidine predominates at over 20 mol % near the distal tip and diminishes to about 5 mol % near the proximal base. The abundance of histidine is directly correlated to transition metal content (Zn or Cu) as well as hardness determined by nanoindentation. EXAFS analyses of the jaws indicate that transition metals such as Zn are directly bound to histidine ligands and may serve as cross-linkers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopolymersEvolution, MolecularHumansMolecular StructureBiopolymers

Identifiers

PMID15196007
PMCPMC1839050
OpenAlexW2075908222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.