Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15191704›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2004

Small molecule activators of the heat shock response and neuroprotection from stroke.

Donald B DeFranco, Louisa Ho, Eric Falke, Clifton W Callaway

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The heat shock response and small molecule regulators.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald B DeFrancoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. dod1@pitt.edu
Louisa Ho
Eric Falke
Clifton W Callaway
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various cellular defense pathways are mobilized in response to stress that serve to limit potential damage to organelles and biochemical pathways that would disrupt normal cellular function or trigger cell death. Strategies utilized by cells subjected to various forms of stress include the activation of detoxification systems that act to eliminate the primary damaging molecules, remove damaged cellular macromolecules, or restore organelle and macromolecule function in cases where loss of activity is generated by reversible modifications or alterations in conformation (ie, misfolding). Central to many intracellular defense mechanisms that operate to limit damage to protein function are molecular chaperones of the heat shock protein (HSP) family. This review briefly discusses the molecular mechanisms that are thought to dictate the well-established neuroprotective effects of HSPs and highlight the recent attempts to use pharmacologic approaches to activate this important cellular defense pathway.

Indexed as

Cell DeathCytoprotectionHumansNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsProteinsStrokeUnited Statesheat stroke proteinsNeuroprotective AgentsProteins

Identifiers

PMID15191704
OpenAlexW1964918909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.