ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2004
After the genome--the phenome?
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale identification of undiagnosed hepatic steatosis using natural language processing.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Personal genomes, participatory genomics and the anonymity-privacy conundrum.Journal of genetics · 2014Article
- Co-clustering phenome-genome for phenotype classification and disease gene discovery.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Saturation of the human phenome.Current genomics · 2010Article
- Traditional medicine and genomics.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine · 2010Article
- The pressure of finding human hypertension genes: new tools, old dilemmas.Journal of human hypertension · 2008Review
- Garrod's Croonian Lectures (1908) and the charter 'Inborn Errors of Metabolism': albinism, alkaptonuria, cystinuria, and pentosuria at age 100 in 2008.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2008Review
- Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- The hepatic transcriptome in human liver disease.Comparative hepatology · 2006Article
- Genes and the eye.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What next? The Human Genome Project signifies complexity rather than simplification in the relationship between genotype and phenotype. Genotypes are embedded in genomes. Individuality in phenotypes is embedded in components of the phenome (transcriptome, metabolome, proteome, etc.). The phenome, its layers, and its nodes, links and networks, require elucidation; there is a need for a Human Phenome Project (Freimer and Sabatti 2003). Biology has largely been a reductive science in the recent past; integrative biology lies ahead. Clinician-scientists (including human biochemical geneticists) will be recognized as key participants in the 'medical' Phenome Project as it reveals components of individuality, and their contributions, in simple or combinatorial fashion, to Mendelian and complex traits; better ways to treat 'genetic disease' will be by-products of the project. Although the Word is common to all, most men live as if each had a private wisdom of his own.Herakleitos
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.