Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2004
Combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) in metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer.British journal of cancer · 2005Trial
- Salvage chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for taxane- and cisplatin-refractory, metastatic gastric cancer.British journal of cancer · 2005Trial
- Current approaches to gastric cancer in Korea.Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR · 2008Article
- Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferases (GST) and thymidylate synthase (TS)--novel predictors for response and survival in gastric cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: slow but further progress.Cancer research and treatment · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on single agent activities and the additive or synergistic effects of three individual drugs in gastric cancer, we performed a phase II study of a new regimen combining epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) for unresectable gastric cancer. The patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer and no history of palliative chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. In total, 40 mg m(-2) epirubicin (reduced to 30 mg m(-2) due to high incidence of febrile neutropaenia; 75%) intravenously (i.v.) over 30 min, followed by 60 mg m(-2) docetaxel i.v. over 1 h, then 75 mg m(-2) cisplatin i.v. over 1 h was administered every 3 weeks. Between January 2002 and February 2003, 30 patients (epirubicin 40 mg m(-2), eight; 30 mg m(-2), 22) were enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range, 33-68). The patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1-8). One patient (3%) achieved a complete response, 13 (43%) showed partial responses, 13 (43%) had stable diseases and three (10%) progressed. The overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 28-66%), and the median duration of response was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-7.0). The median time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.9), and the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.4). Grade 4 neutropaenia were observed in 41%, and febrile neutropaenia in 32%, out of the patients receiving 30 mg m(-2) of epirubicin. Grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities included nausea, vomiting, anorexia and peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, EDP is active in gastric cancer, with a manageable and predictable toxicity profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.