Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15187988›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology2005

Inmate exposure to secondhand smoke in correctional facilities and the impact of smoking restrictions.

S Katharine Hammond, Karen M Emmons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Examining Attitudes, Expectations, and Tobacco Cessation Treatment Outcomes Among Incarcerated Tobacco Smokers.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smoke-free policies in U.S. Prisons and jails: A review of the literature.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Review
  8. How low should you go? Determining the optimal cutoff for exhaled carbon monoxide to confirm smoking abstinence when using cotinine as reference.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Tobacco use by male prisoners under an indoor smoking ban.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S Katharine HammondSchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. hammondk@berkeley.edu
Karen M Emmons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was undertaken to measure the passive smoking exposure of prisoners at three correctional facilities in the US and to evaluate the effectiveness of a ban on smoking in reducing these exposures at two of these facilities. The average weekly concentration of nicotine was measured in fixed locations within the correctional facilities using passive samplers. Samples were collected before and after a smoking ban was instituted, and after the policy was modified to allow smoking outdoors. Samples were collected in the living areas, near where inmates slept and watched TV, and in selected central facilities, including dining halls, visiting rooms, booking areas, and learning centers. Average weekly concentrations of nicotine were measured in 84 locations while smoking was allowed; changes in these concentrations were measured with 112 weekly samples 4 and 9 months after the policy restricting smoking was implemented The average concentrations of nicotine were high while smoking was allowed: most living and sleeping areas averaged 3-11 microg/m(3), but the gym that was used as a bunkroom averaged 25 microg/m(3); these values compare to an average of 2 microg/m(3) in the homes of smokers. The smoking ban significantly reduced nicotine concentrations in the living areas (P<0.01 at facility A and P<0.05 at facility B) to averages of 1.5-2.2 microg/m(3); all postban samples were less than 5 microg/m(3). In conclusion, secondhand smoke concentrations in correctional facilities can be quite high; however, policies banning smoking are effective in reducing, but not eliminating, these exposures.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePrisonsActivities of Daily LivingGanglionic StimulantsHumansNicotinePrisonersPublic PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionGanglionic StimulantsNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID15187988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.