Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15187183›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2004

Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation.

David W Hilbert, Patrick J Piggot

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 364 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paradigm shift formBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Evolutionary bioenergetics of sporulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sporulation kinetics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The megaplasmid pCER270 ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clostridioides difficile Sporulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. ProfilingFuture science OA · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W HilbertDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Temple University School of Medicine, 3400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Patrick J Piggot
Temple University · US

Funding

GENE EXPRESSION DURING SPORULATIONR01GM043577 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI PIGGOT, PATRICK J. · 1990 to 2012
$3.9M
TRAINING PROGRAMS IN MICROBIOLOGY &IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007101 · NIAID · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GANEA, DOINA · 1985 to 2008
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007101NIAID NIH HHS T32AI07101NIGMS NIH HHS GM43577NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression in members of the family Bacillaceae becomes compartmentalized after the distinctive, asymmetrically located sporulation division. It involves complete compartmentalization of the activities of sporulation-specific sigma factors, sigma(F) in the prespore and then sigma(E) in the mother cell, and then later, following engulfment, sigma(G) in the prespore and then sigma(K) in the mother cell. The coupling of the activation of sigma(F) to septation and sigma(G) to engulfment is clear; the mechanisms are not. The sigma factors provide the bare framework of compartment-specific gene expression. Within each sigma regulon are several temporal classes of genes, and for key regulators, timing is critical. There are also complex intercompartmental regulatory signals. The determinants for sigma(F) regulation are assembled before septation, but activation follows septation. Reversal of the anti-sigma(F) activity of SpoIIAB is critical. Only the origin-proximal 30% of a chromosome is present in the prespore when first formed; it takes approximately 15 min for the rest to be transferred. This transient genetic asymmetry is important for prespore-specific sigma(F) activation. Activation of sigma(E) requires sigma(F) activity and occurs by cleavage of a prosequence. It must occur rapidly to prevent the formation of a second septum. sigma(G) is formed only in the prespore. SpoIIAB can block sigma(G) activity, but SpoIIAB control does not explain why sigma(G) is activated only after engulfment. There is mother cell-specific excision of an insertion element in sigK and sigma(E)-directed transcription of sigK, which encodes pro-sigma(K). Activation requires removal of the prosequence following a sigma(G)-directed signal from the prespore.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsCell CompartmentationChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialForecastingGenes, BacterialRegulonSigma FactorSpores, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID15187183
PMCPMC419919
OpenAlexW2099604042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.