Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15186563›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004

Management of patients with suspected angina, but without known myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional survey.

Alessandro Filippi, Gianfranco Gensini, Angelo A Bignanimi, Andrea Sabatini, Giampiero Mazzaglia, Claudio Cricelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Application of NHG guidelines in patients referred for stable chest pain syndromes.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2010
    Article
  3. Gender-based inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  4. Inequalities in access to care for patients with ischaemic heart disease.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro FilippiItalian College of General Practitioners, Florence.
Gianfranco Gensini
Angelo A Bignanimi
Andrea Sabatini
Giampiero Mazzaglia
Claudio Cricelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several studies describing the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) by general practitioners have recently been published, little information exists about patients with angina without MI.

aimTo describe the management of patients with angina without known MI in general practice.

designA cross-sectional survey.

settingItalian general practitioners providing data to the Health Search Database.

methodPrevalent cases of angina, using the prescription of nitrates as a 'proxy' for disease status, in patients without known MI were selected from the Health Search Database. Data on patient demographics, clinical information, established therapies and cardiology visits were collected. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to test which variable made prescription more or less likely.

resultsThere were 10 455 patients with angina. Blood pressure readings were available for 73.8% of patients; in this group 58.9% had inadequate (> or = 140/90 mmHg) blood pressure control. Total cholesterol was recorded in 61.6% of cases (mean value = 5.5 mmol/L). Antiplatelet or oral anticoagulant agents were used by 67.8% of the patients, while 24.1% of patients received lipid-lowering agents, 61% received ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, and 25.2% received beta-blockers.

conclusionsIn patients treated with nitrates the monitoring of modifiable risk factors and the use of preventive drugs is lower than expected. New strategies aimed at improving secondary cardiovascular prevention among these easily identifiable high-risk subjects are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAngina PectorisCardiovascular AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNitratesRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesCardiovascular AgentsNitrates

Identifiers

PMID15186563
PMCPMC1266201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.