ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004
Management of patients with suspected angina, but without known myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term impact of secondary preventive treatments in patients with stable angina.European journal of epidemiology · 2011Trial
- Application of NHG guidelines in patients referred for stable chest pain syndromes.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2010Article
- Gender-based inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005Article
- Inequalities in access to care for patients with ischaemic heart disease.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several studies describing the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) by general practitioners have recently been published, little information exists about patients with angina without MI.
aimTo describe the management of patients with angina without known MI in general practice.
designA cross-sectional survey.
settingItalian general practitioners providing data to the Health Search Database.
methodPrevalent cases of angina, using the prescription of nitrates as a 'proxy' for disease status, in patients without known MI were selected from the Health Search Database. Data on patient demographics, clinical information, established therapies and cardiology visits were collected. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to test which variable made prescription more or less likely.
resultsThere were 10 455 patients with angina. Blood pressure readings were available for 73.8% of patients; in this group 58.9% had inadequate (> or = 140/90 mmHg) blood pressure control. Total cholesterol was recorded in 61.6% of cases (mean value = 5.5 mmol/L). Antiplatelet or oral anticoagulant agents were used by 67.8% of the patients, while 24.1% of patients received lipid-lowering agents, 61% received ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, and 25.2% received beta-blockers.
conclusionsIn patients treated with nitrates the monitoring of modifiable risk factors and the use of preventive drugs is lower than expected. New strategies aimed at improving secondary cardiovascular prevention among these easily identifiable high-risk subjects are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15186563PMC1266201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.